SSS Friction Consultancy
FAQ

Answers to the questions that come up before an engagement starts.

Expertise, services, who this practice is for, pricing models and timelines — covered directly. Anything else, ask on the contact page.

About

Who is Meenaakshisundaram V?+

An independent friction materials consultant with over 30 years inside industry R&D. A M.Tech graduate of IIT Kharagpur (1994), he entered the friction industry the same year as a Graduate Trainee and rose to Vice President of R&D by 2024 at one of India's leading friction industries. He has led formulation, manufacturing process establishment, validation and team development for programmes reaching OEMs and aftermarket channels across India, Europe and North America.

Where is the practice based, and which regions does it serve?+

Based in Chennai, India, with active engagements across North America, Europe, India, Asia-Pacific and the Middle East. Programmes are shaped around each region's regulatory environment — FMVSS and SAE in North America, ECE R90/REACH/Euro 6-7 in Europe, on-the-ground OEM and Tier-1 work across India, ASEAN, Japan and Korea, and market-entry and homologation support across GCC and wider Middle East markets.

Is Meenaakshisundaram V available for full-time or executive roles?+

No — the practice is structured as independent consulting only: fixed-scope projects, retainer advisory and mentorship engagements, not full-time employment. That said, if you have an opportunity you think is worth discussing, reach out.

Expertise

What areas of friction materials expertise are covered?+

The full friction material stack: formulation chemistry (low-steel, semi-metallic, metallic, NAO, copper- and lead-free systems, carbon fibre composites); braking products (commercial vehicle drum linings and disc pads, passenger car brake pads, agricultural tractor liners, sintered ceramic buttons); and R&D processes (formulation development, manufacturing process control, raw material development, dynamometer and vehicle validation, PPAP/APQP, SPC, FMEA).

Does the expertise extend to EV-specific braking challenges?+

Yes. Current work includes early-stage development for electric vehicles, with particular focus on the noise and NVH characteristics that emerge under regenerative braking — an area with less institutional knowledge than conventional friction braking.

Services

What consulting services are offered?+

The practice covers two tiers. Core services (six): technical & R&D strategy, OEM and aftermarket entry strategy, lab setup and optimisation, troubleshooting and failure analysis, material development, and training and mentorship. Specialist engagements (two): technical due diligence for investment firms and analysts, and research advisory and collaboration for academic institutions and research laboratories. Full descriptions are on the Services page.

Can an engagement combine more than one of these services?+

Yes — most engagements do. A typical multi-quarter programme might start with strategy and a lab-gap assessment, move into material development, and close with OEM-submission support and team training, all under one engagement.

What does technical due diligence involve?+

An independent technical assessment of a friction-material or braking-system business — covering technology validation, formulation and IP review, manufacturing process maturity, regulatory compliance standing and market-entry credibility. Commissioned by investment firms, private-equity and venture capital teams who need a grounded view of what they are acquiring or funding.

How does research advisory and collaboration work?+

Advisory or collaborative support for academic institutions and research laboratories working on friction, tribology or composite materials. The scope is defined by the research team — it can range from study design and experimental methodology guidance to results interpretation and industry-context framing, or a longer-term collaboration on a funded research programme.

Who this practice serves

Who typically engages this practice?+

EV and deep-tech startups building braking systems from scratch; OEMs and Tier-1 suppliers extending or troubleshooting existing programmes; aftermarket manufacturers pursuing new regulatory approvals or geographies; investment firms, private-equity and venture capital teams commissioning technical due diligence on friction-material or braking-system targets; and academic institutions and research laboratories seeking expert advisory or collaboration on tribology and composite materials studies.

Does the practice work with organisations outside these categories?+

Yes — the practice is not limited to the categories above. Legal and insurance teams needing an independent technical read on a field failure, and any organisation whose problem sits inside friction, tribology or composite materials, are in scope. If the underlying question is technical, it is worth a conversation.

Tribology & adjacent wear

Is the practice limited to brake friction materials?+

Brake friction materials are the core — three decades of it. But friction, wear and lubrication are tribology problems, and tribology shows up anywhere two surfaces move against each other: clutch systems, gears, bearings and industrial wear components all sit inside the same underlying discipline.

Will a wear or friction problem outside braking be considered?+

Yes, open for discussion. If a problem is fundamentally about wear, friction or surface interaction — even outside automotive braking — it's worth raising in an initial conversation to see whether the underlying tribology expertise applies.

Pricing & engagement models

How is an engagement priced?+

Pricing follows the shape of the work. Defined-scope projects — a failure analysis, a lab design, a formulation sprint — are quoted per-project once the scope is understood. Ongoing advisory relationships, such as sitting alongside an R&D team through a multi-quarter programme, are typically structured as a monthly retainer.

Are there alternatives to project fees or retainers?+

For select longer-term partnerships — particularly early-stage startups where cash is constrained — alternative structures are open for discussion: profit-sharing arrangements, or an advisory stake tied to the company's financial health and milestones, in place of or alongside a cash fee. These are evaluated case-by-case in an initial conversation, not offered as a standard menu.

What determines which pricing model fits an engagement?+

Mainly scope and stage: a bounded technical task suits a project fee, an open-ended advisory relationship suits a retainer, and an early-stage company with limited runway but strong upside is where a profit-share or equity-linked structure tends to make sense for both sides.

Timeline & availability

How long does a typical engagement run?+

Anywhere from a single-week failure-analysis sprint to a multi-quarter programme carrying a formulation from bench to OEM approval. Scope is set collaboratively before work begins, so the timeline is known upfront rather than open-ended.

How quickly can an engagement start?+

Most engagements start with a 30-minute introductory conversation. Initial enquiries submitted through the contact form receive a response within two business days.